ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024
Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin: A liquid biopsy for intra-amniotic inflammation.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Infection in Pregnancy Is Associated with Amniotic Oxidative Stress: Insights from AOPP and MDA on Neonatal Outcomes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin: A liquid biopsy for intra-amniotic inflammation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIntra-amniotic inflammation is causally linked to spontaneous preterm labor. The gold standard for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation is the determination of an amniotic fluid profile obtained from transabdominal amniocentesis, which is invasive. Cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin (fFN) is a widely-used predictive biomarker for spontaneous preterm labor. The aims of this study are to determine (1) whether a quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN test can be used to identify the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation; and (2) an appropriate cut-off value of a cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective cohort study included 78 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes who had a sample collected for quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN measurement and underwent transabdominal amniocentesis. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentration ≥2.6 ng/mL. Clinicians were masked from the results of cervicovaginal fluid fFN and amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors were significant predictors of intra-amniotic inflammation. The diagnostic indices of the cervicovaginal fluid fFN test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation were calculated.
results(1) Frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation was 26.9% (21/78); (2) the higher the cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation (p < 0.001); (3) cervicovaginal fluid fFN concentration ≥125 ng/mL had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.96) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation with 100% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, 82.46% specificity and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.7; and (4) cervicovaginal fluid fFN cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a significant higher predictive performance than the traditional cut-off (50 ng/mL) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation.
conclusionsQuantitative cervicovaginal fluid fFN with a cut-off of 125 ng/mL had a high sensitivity and a negative predictive value as well as a positive likelihood ratio for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. Its high sensitivity and negative predictive value can be used to decrease an index of suspicion of intra-amniotic inflammation. This test may be useful as an initial assessment test to select appropriate patients for amniocentesis to determine intra-amniotic inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.