Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287056›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2024

Engaging athletes as research participants. A document analysis of published sport science literature.

Lachlan Mitchell, Josie Ratcliff, Louise M Burke, Adrienne Forsyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Consensus Statements-Optimizing Performance of the Elite Athlete.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lachlan MitchellSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-3688
Josie RatcliffSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise M BurkeMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-5637
Adrienne ForsythSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-2638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sport science practitioners utilise findings from peer reviewed research to inform practice. Fewer studies are conducted with high performance athletes, however, than those involving recreationally active participants. Noting that research findings from recreational athletes may not be generalisable to the elite, there is a need to engage the latter cohort in research with better potential to influence health and performance. This study identified methods used to engage and recruit highly trained, elite and world class athletes as research participants. A document analysis was conducted using a purposive sample of peer-reviewed sport science literature. All articles published in 2022 from 18 highly ranked sport science journals were screened for inclusion. Studies investigating athletes ranked as highly trained/national level or above were included. All details related to participant recruitment were extracted from included articles, with the content being coded and thematically analysed using an interpretivist approach. A total of 439 studies from the 2356 screened were included in the analysis. Five primary themes of recruitment strategies were identified, beneath an overarching strategy of purposeful, convenience sampling. Recruitment themes related to the use of a gatekeeper, the research environment providing convenient access to athletes, promoting the study electronically, utilising professional networks and recruiting at training or competition. Engaging athletes through a gatekeeper is a prominent strategy to involve elite athletes in research. It is suggested that researchers work collaboratively with team or organisation personnel to promote recruitment, creating co-designed approaches that address issues most relevant to athletes and staff.

Indexed as

AthletesDocument AnalysisHumansPatient SelectionResearch SubjectsSportsathlete engagementcollaborationembedded researchergatekeeperresearch co‐design

Identifiers

PMID39287056
PMCPMC11451557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.