Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286990›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

A comparison of work characteristics and health status between Korean and US hospital nurses.

Kihye Han, Alison M Trinkoff, Hyang Baek, Yeonhee Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kihye HanChung-Ang University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0128-0369
Alison M TrinkoffUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hyang BaekUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yeonhee KimUniversity of Ulsan Department of Clinical Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

Chung-Ang UniversityKorean Hospital Nurse AssociationNational Council of State Boards of Nursing #R19B07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA rigorous examination of the occupational features across cultures helps draw policy recommendations for nurses' quality care practices and good health. This study aimed to explore the differences in work characteristics and health status between Korean and US hospital nurses.

designFor this comparative secondary data analysis study, we constructed a dataset with 304 pairs of nurses from Korea and the United States, matched by age and gender.

methodsWe used the data from the 2020 Korean Hospital Nurses Health Behaviors and Health Status study, collected from May to July 2020, and the Nurse Worklife and Wellness Study (NWWS), conducted between November 2020 and February 2021.

resultsCompared to nurses in the United States, Korean nurses rated their job-related conditions much lower, had lower intentions to stay in their current workplace and were less satisfied with their jobs. Korean nurses reported that organizational support and employee health resources were less prevalent and their levels of healthy behaviour practice and health status were lower than their US counterparts. Nurses in Korea require better practice environments and employee health support. Adequate workload and staffing levels are needed to improve job conditions for Korean nurses. Organizational support and employee health resources should always be accessible at nurses' workplaces.

Indexed as

Health StatusJob SatisfactionNursing Staff, HospitalWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkloadhealthKoreanurseorganizational supportUnited Stateswork conditions

Identifiers

PMID39286990
PMCPMC11406312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.