Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286936›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024

External validation of a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue on abdominal CT images.

David P J van Dijk, Leroy F Volmer, Ralph Brecheisen, Bibi Martens, Ross D Dolan, Adam S Bryce, David K Chang, Donald C McMillan, Jan H M B Stoot, Malcolm A West and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep-learning pipeline for automated skeletal muscle segmentation and sarcopenia detection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David P J van DijkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-5402
Leroy F VolmerDepartment of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Ralph BrecheisenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Bibi MartensGROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands.
Ross D DolanAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Glasgow, G31 2ER, United Kingdom.
Adam S BryceWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
David K ChangWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Donald C McMillanAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Glasgow, G31 2ER, United Kingdom.
Jan H M B StootDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Geleen, 6162 BG, The Netherlands.
Malcolm A WestAcademic Unit of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Sander S RensenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Leonard WeeDepartment of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-9055
Steven W M Olde DaminkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Body Composition Collaborative

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBody composition assessment using CT images at the L3-level is increasingly applied in cancer research and has been shown to be strongly associated with long-term survival. Robust high-throughput automated segmentation is key to assess large patient cohorts and to support implementation of body composition analysis into routine clinical practice. We trained and externally validated a deep learning neural network (DLNN) to automatically segment L3-CT images.

methodsExpert-drawn segmentations of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) and skeletal muscle (SM) of L3-CT-images of 3187 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were used to train a DLNN. The external validation cohort was comprised of 2535 patients with abdominal cancer. DLNN performance was evaluated with (geometric) dice similarity (DS) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.

resultsThere was a strong concordance between automatic and manual segmentations with median DS for SM, VAT, and SAT of 0.97 (IQR: 0.95-0.98), 0.98 (IQR: 0.95-0.98), and 0.95 (IQR: 0.92-0.97), respectively. Concordance correlations were excellent: SM 0.964 (0.959-0.968), VAT 0.998 (0.998-0.998), and SAT 0.992 (0.991-0.993). Bland-Altman metrics indicated only small and clinically insignificant systematic offsets; SM radiodensity: 0.23 Hounsfield units (0.5%), SM: 1.26 cm2.m-2 (2.8%), VAT: -1.02 cm2.m-2 (1.7%), and SAT: 3.24 cm2.m-2 (4.6%).

conclusionA robustly-performing and independently externally validated DLNN for automated body composition analysis was developed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This DLNN was successfully trained and externally validated on several large patient cohorts. The trained algorithm could facilitate large-scale population studies and implementation of body composition analysis into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMuscle, SkeletalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdipose TissueAgedBody CompositionFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, Abdominalbody compositionconvolutional neural networksCTdeep learningimage segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39286936
PMCPMC11573127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.