ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
Quantitative orbital tightening for pain assessment using machine learning with DeepLabCut.
Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based automated scoring of the mouse grimace scale: a systematic review.Pain reports · 2026Review
- GrimACE: automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice.Lab animal · 2026Article
- Behavioral assessment of pain in rodents: advances from evoked responses to spontaneous states and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pain assessment in animal models is essential for understanding mechanisms underlying pathological pain and developing effective pain medicine. The grimace scale (GS), facial expression features in pain such as orbital tightening (OT), is a valuable measure for assessing pain in animal models. However, the classical grimace scale for pain assessment is labor-intensive, subject to subjectivity and inconsistency, and is not a quantitative measure. In the present study, we utilized machine learning with DeepLabCut to annotate the superior and inferior eyelid margins and the medial and lateral canthus of the eyes in animals' video images. Based on the annotation, we quantified the eyelid distance and palpebral fissure width of the animals' eyes so that the degree of OT in animals with pain could be measured and described quantitatively. We established criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of the annotated images for quantifying OT, and validated our quantitative grimace scale (qGS) in the mice with pain caused by capsaicin injections in the orofacial or hindpaw regions, the Nav1.8-ChR2 mice following orofacial noxious stimulation with laser light, and the oxaliplatin-treated mice following tactile stimulation with a von Frey filament. We showed that both the eyelid distance and the palpebral fissure width were shortened significantly in the animals in pain compared to the control animals without nociceptive stimulation. Collectively, the present study has established a quantitative orbital tightening for pain assessment in mice using DeepLabCut, providing a new tool for pain assessment in preclinical studies with mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.