ReviewCureus2024
A Comprehensive Review on a Prosthetic Finger Fabrication Approach: Clinical Rest Position (CRP) vs Palms and Fingers Extended (PFE).
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creating effective prosthetic fingers involves precise treatment planning and skilled fabrication to restore aesthetic appearance and passive function. Successful outcomes depend significantly on retention and how closely the prosthesis mimics natural finger contours. We analyzed techniques for fabricating finger prostheses with palms and fingers in clinical rest position (CRP) versus palms and fingers extended (PFE) straight out. The aesthetics and function (passive) were also examined when fabricated in these two physiological conditions. We reviewed 20 articles from national and international journals over 20 years. Most literature focuses on extended posture fabrication, with few addressing CRP. This review article compares the CRP and PFE prosthetic finger fabrication approaches and explains how a prosthetic finger fabricated in a CRP offers superior aesthetic and partial functional outcomes and emerges as a promising alternative to the PFE. The potential impact of these findings on prosthodontics is significant, emphasizing the need for further research to validate these results and the ongoing development in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.