ArticleCureus2024
Health Education Resources Favored by Out-Patients Attending King Saud Medical City, Riyadh.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An Evidence Summary of Health Education in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Practice-Oriented Assessment with Inter-Rater Reliability.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Perceived Credibility of Public Health Campaigns and Its Impact on Infection Control Behaviors: Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Motivation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Health education, primarily through printed materials, is crucial for promoting preventive healthcare. It is essential to understand patients' preferences and ensure patient engagement in healthcare decisions. Health literacy challenges persist, and web-based platforms are expanding access. Tailoring materials to target populations, considering content, layout, and cultural appropriateness, maximizes effectiveness. This study aimed to determine the preferred health education resources for patients visiting King Saud Medical City, Riyadh. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, targeting adults in outpatient and staff clinic waiting areas. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire and analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0 (Released 2023; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results The study included 210 participants and revealed key preferences in health education. Notably, 57.6% preferred social media platforms, while 49.1% favored a doctor as their primary source. Participants prioritized pictures/photos (27.8%) and labels (56.2%) for printed materials. Most participants (91.4%) chose formats based on the comprehensive content provided. Participants sought general health guidance (26%) and preferences were significantly associated with education levels (p=0.010) and different sources (p<0.001). Additionally, students showed a significant association with receiving health education (p=0.046). Conclusion The current study revealed diverse preferences for health education resources among patients at King Saud Medical City. The most favored method was social media platforms (57.6%, n=121), with participants ranking it as their first preference. Understanding these preferences is crucial for tailored and effective health education strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.