Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286663›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Acute Phase Peyronie's Disease: Where Do We Stand?

Konstantinos Douroumis, Konstantinos Kotrotsios, Panagiotis Katsikatsos, Napoleon Moulavasilis, Evangelos Fragkiadis, Dionysios Mitropoulos, Ioannis Adamakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos DouroumisDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Konstantinos KotrotsiosDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Panagiotis KatsikatsosDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Napoleon MoulavasilisDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Evangelos FragkiadisDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Dionysios MitropoulosDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Ioannis AdamakisDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD) is a common benign condition characterized by superficial fibrosis and scar formation at the tunica albuginea of the penis, eventually leading to penile curvature. It is believed that penile micro-traumas during intercourse and subsequent activation of inflammatory processes constitute the pathogenetic basis of the disease. Routinely, PD is divided into acute and chronic phases, with pain during erection or flaccid state being the hallmark of the former. Surgical intervention should be avoided during the acute phase, as the risk of recurrence or progression of penile deformity during this stage might affect the optimal outcomes of the procedure. During this stage, many conservative treatment options have been suggested, including oral, topical, and intralesional therapies, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and penile traction therapy (PTT). Currently, the optimal treatment consists of a combined treatment strategy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), ESWT for pain management, PTT, and intralesional therapies. Large, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to further elucidate the most efficient treatment option for acute phase PD.

Indexed as

acute phaseandrologymale sexual healthpenile curvaturepeyronie disease

Identifiers

PMID39286663
PMCPMC11403542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.