ReviewJournal of blood medicine2024
Newer Modalities and Updates in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coping Skills, Hospitalizations, and Hopefulness in Youths with Sickle Cell Disease Treated in a Regional Outpatient Comprehensive Pediatric Center.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Updated Review of Current Therapeutic Approaches for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Temporal trends and determinants of ED visits in sickle cell disease: a multicenter EHR study from Saudi Arabia (2016-2021).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating CRISPR/Cas technology with clinical trials: Principles, progress and challenges.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Review
- Giant platelets and persistent bleeding: a pediatric case of Bernard-Soulier syndrome.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD), the most common autosomal recessive genetic disorder, affects the hemoglobin (Hb) chains in human red blood cells. It is caused by mutations in the β-globin genes, leading to the production of hemoglobin S, which results in the formation of sickle-shaped red blood cells (RBCs). These abnormal cells cause hemolysis, endothelial damage, and small vessel occlusion, leading to both acute and long-term complications. According to the World Health Organization's 2008 estimates, SCD affects approximately 2.28 per 1000 individuals globally. Despite this high prevalence, therapeutic advancements have been slow. For many years, the only FDA-approved medications for managing SCD complications were hydroxyurea and deferiprone. However, recent years have seen the approval of several new therapies, including L-glutamine (2017), voxelotor and crizanlizumab (2019), as well as exagamglogene autotemcel (Casgevy) and lovotibeglogene autotemcel (Lyfgenia) (2023). These treatments have proven effective in managing both the acute and chronic effects of SCD, including hemolytic anemia, chronic pain, stroke, vaso-occlusive crises, and multiple organ damage syndromes. This review explores the mechanisms of action, practical considerations, and side effects of these emerging therapies, drawing from a comprehensive search of databases such as PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.