ArticleGastro hep advances2024
The Oral Cholate Challenge Test Quantifies Risk for Liver-Related Clinical Outcomes in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic cholate clearance as assessed by HepQuant-SHUNT is associated with clinical outcomes in individuals with Fontan circulation.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) May Preserve Hepatic Function and Reduce Portal-Systemic Shunting in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease: Results From the SHUNT-V Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Evidence Supporting Utility of the Oral Cholate Challenge Test of Liver Function and Physiology to Aid Clinical Management: A Review of Analytical and Clinical Validation Studies.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- The Cholate Challenge Test Quantified Baseline Functional Heterogeneity and Improvement in Response to Resmetirom in MASH-related Child-Pugh A Cirrhosis.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of an oral cholate challenge test for the management of patients at risk for large esophageal varices.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: We quantified hepatic functional impairment using quantitative function tests and linked severity of functional impairment to liver-related complications and outcome in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Methods: Forty-seven patients had baseline testing, and 40 were retested after 1 year. For each test, cholates labeled with cold, nonradioactive isotopes were administered orally (DuO, SHUNT tests) and intravenously (SHUNT test), and blood was analyzed at 20 and 60 minutes (DuO), or 0, 5, 20, 45, 60, and 90 minutes (SHUNT). Disease severity index (DSI), hepatic reserve (HR%), and portal-systemic shunting (SHUNT%) were calculated. Results: Three subgroups with low, moderate, and high disease severity were defined from the age-adjusted results for DSI, HR%, and SHUNT%. Standard laboratory tests, clinical scores, cytokine levels, and clinical outcome correlated with these subgroups. In univariate analysis of baseline tests, SHUNT% was a strong predictor of clinical outcome (n = 13 of 47; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84 Conclusion: DSI, HR%, and SHUNT% identified subgroups of primary sclerosing cholangitis based on the age-related severity of hepatic impairment that predicted risk for liver-related clinical outcome. Further study is warranted to confirm and validate these intriguing findings both in studies of natural progression of primary sclerosing cholangitis and in clinical trials. DuO enhances the utility of quantitative liver function testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.