Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286480›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2024

Trusted artificial intelligence for environmental assessments: An explainable high-precision model with multi-source big data.

Haoli Xu, Xing Yang, Yihua Hu, Daqing Wang, Zhenyu Liang, Hua Mu, Yangyang Wang, Liang Shi, Haoqi Gao, Daoqing Song and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Haoli XuState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Xing YangState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Yihua HuState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Daqing WangDefense Engineering College, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, 210007, China.
Zhenyu LiangState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Hua MuState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Yangyang WangState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Liang ShiJianghuai Advance Technology Center, Hefei, 230000, China.
Haoqi GaoState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Daoqing SongInternational Studies College, National University of Defense Technology, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Zijian ChengDefense Engineering College, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, 210007, China.
Zhao LuDefense Engineering College, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, 210007, China.
Xiaoning ZhaoDefense Engineering College, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, 210007, China.
Jun LuState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Bingwen WangState Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230037, China.
Zhiyang HuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental assessments are critical for ensuring the sustainable development of human civilization. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in these assessments has shown great promise, yet the "black box" nature of AI models often undermines trust due to the lack of transparency in their decision-making processes, even when these models demonstrate high accuracy. To address this challenge, we evaluated the performance of a transformer model against other AI approaches, utilizing extensive multivariate and spatiotemporal environmental datasets encompassing both natural and anthropogenic indicators. We further explored the application of saliency maps as a novel explainability tool in multi-source AI-driven environmental assessments, enabling the identification of individual indicators' contributions to the model's predictions. We find that the transformer model outperforms others, achieving an accuracy of about 98% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.891. Regionally, the environmental assessment values are predominantly classified as level II or III in the central and southwestern study areas, level IV in the northern region, and level V in the western region. Through explainability analysis, we identify that water hardness, total dissolved solids, and arsenic concentrations are the most influential indicators in the model. Our AI-driven environmental assessment model is accurate and explainable, offering actionable insights for targeted environmental management. Furthermore, this study advances the application of AI in environmental science by presenting a robust, explainable model that bridges the gap between machine learning and environmental governance, enhancing both understanding and trust in AI-assisted environmental assessments.

Indexed as

Explainable AIIntelligent environmental assessmentMulti-source dataTransformer

Identifiers

PMID39286480
PMCPMC11402945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.