Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286461›Full record

ArticleWater research X2024

Evaluating energy balance and environmental footprint of sludge management in BRICS countries.

Zhenyao Wang, Xuan Li, Huan Liu, Jinhua Mou, Stuart J Khan, Carol Sze Ki Lin, Qilin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhenyao WangCenter for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Xuan LiCenter for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Huan LiuCenter for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Jinhua MouSchool of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China.
Stuart J KhanSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Carol Sze Ki LinSchool of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China.
Qilin WangCenter for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is driving global endeavours to achieve carbon neutrality and renewable energy expansion. Sludge, a nutrient-rich waste, holds energy potential yet poses environmental challenges that need proper management. We conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the energy balance and environmental footprint of the most commonly used sludge management scenarios in BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Technologies such as incineration and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery units (i.e., cogeneration unit) maximize energy balance and minimize the environmental footprint, with incineration showing a superior performance. Shifting sludge management scenarios from the worst to the best can boost energy production by 1.4-98.4 times and cut the environmental footprint by 1.5-21.4 times. In 2050, these improvements could lead to a 98-fold boost in energy generation and a 25-fold drop in carbon emissions, according to the Announced Pledges Scenarios. Optimizing parameters such as volatile solids and anaerobic digestion efficiency further boosts energy output and minimizes the environmental footprint. This study offers robust evidence to support sustainable sludge management and thus promote energy recovery and carbon neutrality goals, guide technological transitions, and inform policymaking for sustainable development.

Indexed as

BRICS countriesCarbon neutralityEnergy balanceEnvironmental impactsLife cycle assessmentSludge management

Identifiers

PMID39286461
PMCPMC11404187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.