Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286439›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Identifying barriers and facilitators to follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR): Qualitative study design and protocol.

Amanda R Phillips, Lindsey A Olivere, Marissa C Jarosinski, Jackie L Barnes, Salim Habib, Edith Tzeng, Kimberly J Rak, Nathan L Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda R PhillipsDivision of Vascular Surgery, Temple Health, 3509N. Broad Street, Boyer Pavilion, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
Lindsey A OlivereDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, E362.4, South Tower PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Marissa C JarosinskiDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, E362.4, South Tower PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Jackie L BarnesUniversity of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street. Alan Magee Scaife Hall, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Salim HabibDepartment of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Avenue, Suite 556, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States.
Edith TzengDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, E362.4, South Tower PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Kimberly J RakUniversity of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street. Alan Magee Scaife Hall, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Nathan L LiangDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, E362.4, South Tower PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.

Funding

Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is now first line therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as it reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery. However, up to 40 % of patients do not undergo recommended follow-up, increasing risk of subsequent rupture. Risk factors for loss to follow-up have been studied retrospectively, however, qualitative studies assessing perceived barriers and facilitators to follow-up have not been performed and there are few qualitative protocols within the vascular surgery literature. This article presents a qualitative descriptive study protocol aimed at understanding and improving post-operative follow-up adherence after EVAR developed through an iterative process based on the Theoretical Domains Framework of behavior change. Steps include:•Selection of target behavior and study design•Development of study materials, sampling/recruitment strategy, and data collection•Qualitative data analysis and reporting findingsWe demonstrate the feasibility of this study by pilot testing of the semi-structured interview guides on a small group of patients, healthcare providers, and key personnel. This protocol aims to describe key stakeholder experiences within the healthcare system that will ultimately serve as the basis for future multi-institutional research piloting intervention strategies to improve EVAR follow-up.

Indexed as

Application of the Theoretical Domains Framework to Loss to Follow-Up After Endovascular Aortic RepairEndovascular aortic repairEVARProtocolQualitativeSemi-structured interviewTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID39286439
PMCPMC11403246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.