ReviewData in brief2024
Heterogeneous data integration: Challenges and opportunities.
Review in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancing Health Care With Digital Twins: Meta-Review of Applications and Implementation Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing optimal transport and machine learning approaches for databases merging in scenarios involving missing data in covariates. Application to medical research.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Leveraging technologies for data management and sharing to foster collaboration and implement data spaces.Data in brief · 2026Article
- IFC-HFlowVAE: A self-enhancing generative framework with structural anchoring for imbalanced clinical data augmentation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence on data quality in precision oncology platforms: insights from the Molecular Twin Research Umbrella protocol.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Ontologies as the semantic bridge between artificial intelligence and healthcare.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Multimodal data-driven approaches in retinal vein occlusion: A narrative review integrating machine learning and bioinformatics.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating multiple data source technologies is essential for organizations to respond to highly dynamic market needs. Although physical data integration systems have been considered to have better query processing systems, they pose higher implementation and maintenance costs. Meanwhile, virtual data integration has become an alternative topic that is increasingly attracting the attention of researchers in the current era of big data. Various data integration methodologies have been developed and used in various domains, processing heterogeneous data using various approaches. This review article aims to provide an overview of heterogeneous data integration research focusing on methodology and approaches. It surveys existing publications, highlighting key trends, challenges, and open research topics. The main findings are: (i) Research has been conducted in various domains. However, most focus on big data rather than specific study domains; (ii) researchers primarily focus on semantics challenges, and (iii) gaps still need to be addressed and related to integration issues involving semantics and unstructured data formats that must be thoroughly addressed. Furthermore, considering elements of cutting-edge technology, such as machine learning and data integration, about privacy concerns provides a chance for additional investigation. Finally, we provide insight into the potential for a broader review of integration challenges based on case studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.