Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286416›Full record

ReviewData in brief2024

Heterogeneous data integration: Challenges and opportunities.

I Made Putrama, Péter Martinek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I Made PutramaDepartment of Electronics Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter MartinekDepartment of Electronics Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating multiple data source technologies is essential for organizations to respond to highly dynamic market needs. Although physical data integration systems have been considered to have better query processing systems, they pose higher implementation and maintenance costs. Meanwhile, virtual data integration has become an alternative topic that is increasingly attracting the attention of researchers in the current era of big data. Various data integration methodologies have been developed and used in various domains, processing heterogeneous data using various approaches. This review article aims to provide an overview of heterogeneous data integration research focusing on methodology and approaches. It surveys existing publications, highlighting key trends, challenges, and open research topics. The main findings are: (i) Research has been conducted in various domains. However, most focus on big data rather than specific study domains; (ii) researchers primarily focus on semantics challenges, and (iii) gaps still need to be addressed and related to integration issues involving semantics and unstructured data formats that must be thoroughly addressed. Furthermore, considering elements of cutting-edge technology, such as machine learning and data integration, about privacy concerns provides a chance for additional investigation. Finally, we provide insight into the potential for a broader review of integration challenges based on case studies.

Indexed as

Big dataData sourcesHeterogeneousIntegrationOntologyReview

Identifiers

PMID39286416
PMCPMC11402636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.