ArticleIn silico pharmacology2024
Discovery, lead identification and exploration of potential oxadiazole derivatives in targeting STAT3 as anti-cancer agents.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling bioactive potential and production inChinese herbal medicines · 2025Review
- Design, synthesis,Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxadiazoles an important heterocyclic scaffold of medicinal importance in the field of drug discovery. In the study, a library of oxadiazole based compounds was selected for screening against STAT-3 as anti-cancer target. STAT3 is a potential target of interest in cancer therapy. A total of 544 screened library of compounds was subjected to molecular docking against STAT-3 (6NJS and 6NQU). The compounds with good dock score and binding interations were further subjected to in-silico ADME analysis followed by toxicity estimation. A total of 141 hits were selected against 6NJS and 50 hits against 6NQU and further screened for kinetic properties and drug likeliness. The compounds were screened on the basis of physico-chemical properties, solubility, gastrointestinal absorption, BBB permeability, synthetic accessibility, Lipinski and other violations. Best compounds obtained after ADME analysis were further subjected for toxicity analysis. Carcinogenecity, mutagenicity, Ames and other important parameters were considered for toxicity based screening. The best leads thus obtained (compound 114 and 40) were further subjected to molecular dynamics against the respective target proteins. MD simulations were run to access the stability of C-114 and C-40 along with the dynamic behaviour of both complexes for about 100 ns and shows good stability with the proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.