Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286293›Full record

ReviewNorth American Spine Society journal2024

Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient.

Umesh S Metkar, W Jacob Lavelle, Kylan Larsen, Ram Haddas, William F Lavelle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Generation and validation of a Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold for predicting mechanical and junctional complications following thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Umesh S MetkarDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSCO8 4720 1 UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, United States.
W Jacob LavelleDepartment of Chemistry, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY, 13346, United States.
Kylan LarsenDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSCO8 4720 1 UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, United States.
Ram HaddasCenter for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14627, United States.
William F LavelleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 705 E. Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13201, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aging spine often presents multifaceted surgical challenges for the surgeon because it can directly and indirectly impact a patient's spinal alignment and quality of life. Elderly and osteoporotic patients are predisposed to progressive spinal deformities and potential neurologic compromise and surgical management can be difficult because these patients often present with greater frailty. Methods: This was a literature review of spinal alignment changes, preoperative considerations, and spinal alignment considerations for surgical strategies. Results: Many factors impact spinal alignment as we age including lumbar lordosis flexibility, hip flexion, deformity, and osteoporosis. Preoperative considerations are required to assess the patient's overall health, bone mineral density, and osteoporosis medications. Careful radiographic assessment of the spinopelvic parameters using various classification/scoring systems provide the surgeon with goals for surgical treatment. An individualized surgical strategy can be planned for the patient including extent of surgery, surgical approach, extent of the constructs, fixation techniques, vertebral augmentation, ligamentous augmentation, and staging surgery. Conclusions: Surgical treatment should only be considered after a thorough assessment of the patient's health, deformity, bone quality and corresponding age matched alignment goals. An individualized treatment approach is often required to tackle the deformity and minimize the risk of hardware related complications and pseudarthrosis. Anabolic agents offer a promising benefit in this patient population by directly addressing and improving their bone quality and mineral density preoperatively and postoperatively.

Indexed as

Adult spinal deformityAdult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index (ASD-FI)Body mass index (BMI)Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scoreOsteoporosisScoliosis Research Society-Schwab Adult Deformity ClassificationSpinal alignment

Identifiers

PMID39286293
PMCPMC11404170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.