Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286244›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

Harnessing the potential of the NALT and BALT as targets for immunomodulation using engineering strategies to enhance mucosal uptake.

Madison L Seefeld, Erin L Templeton, Justin M Lehtinen, Noah Sinclair, Daman Yadav, Brittany L Hartwell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madison L Seefeld *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Erin L Templeton *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Justin M Lehtinen *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Noah Sinclair *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Daman Yadav *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Brittany L HartwellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal barrier tissues and their mucosal associated lymphoid tissues (MALT) are attractive targets for vaccines and immunotherapies due to their roles in both priming and regulating adaptive immune responses. The upper and lower respiratory mucosae, in particular, possess unique properties: a vast surface area responsible for frontline protection against inhaled pathogens but also simultaneous tight regulation of homeostasis against a continuous backdrop of non-pathogenic antigen exposure. Within the upper and lower respiratory tract, the nasal and bronchial associated lymphoid tissues (NALT and BALT, respectively) are key sites where antigen-specific immune responses are orchestrated against inhaled antigens, serving as critical training grounds for adaptive immunity. Many infectious diseases are transmitted via respiratory mucosal sites, highlighting the need for vaccines that can activate resident frontline immune protection in these tissues to block infection. While traditional parenteral vaccines that are injected tend to elicit weak immunity in mucosal tissues, mucosal vaccines (i.e., that are administered intranasally) are capable of eliciting both systemic and mucosal immunity in tandem by initiating immune responses in the MALT. In contrast, administering antigen to mucosal tissues in the absence of adjuvant or costimulatory signals can instead induce antigen-specific tolerance by exploiting regulatory mechanisms inherent to MALT, holding potential for mucosal immunotherapies to treat autoimmunity. Yet despite being well motivated by mucosal biology, development of both mucosal subunit vaccines and immunotherapies has historically been plagued by poor drug delivery across mucosal barriers, resulting in weak efficacy, short-lived responses, and to-date a lack of clinical translation. Development of engineering strategies that can overcome barriers to mucosal delivery are thus critical for translation of mucosal subunit vaccines and immunotherapies. This review covers engineering strategies to enhance mucosal uptake via active targeting and passive transport mechanisms, with a parallel focus on mechanisms of immune activation and regulation in the respiratory mucosa. By combining engineering strategies for enhanced mucosal delivery with a better understanding of immune mechanisms in the NALT and BALT, we hope to illustrate the potential of these mucosal sites as targets for immunomodulation.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalImmunomodulationAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsHumansLymphoid TissueNasal MucosaRespiratory MucosaVaccinesVaccinesadaptive immunityantigen specific immunotherapy (ASIT)bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (BALT)drug deliverygerminal center (GC)mucosal vaccinenasal associated lymphoid tissue (NALT)secretory IgA (SIgA)

Identifiers

PMID39286244
PMCPMC11403286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.