ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Hydroxychloroquine as an add-on therapy for the induction therapy of MPO-AAV: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphometric analysis and immunobiological investigation ofOpen life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The remission rate of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients who received standard induction therapy is far from satisfactory. Improving the remission rate of MPO-AAV patients is essential. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), one of the classic antimalarial drugs, has been widely used in various autoimmune rheumatic diseases. This retrospective observational cohort study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCQ during induction treatment for MPO-AAV. Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with MPO-AAV at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2021 to September 2023 were collected. They were assigned to the HCQ group or control group according to whether they used HCQ. The patients included were screened by propensity score matching. To evaluate whether MPO-AAV patients benefited from HCQ, we compared the prognosis of the two groups. The adverse effects of HCQ during follow-up were recorded. Results: The composition ratio of complete remission, response and treatment resistance between HCQ group and control group were different statistically ( Conclusions: HCQ together with standard induction treatment may improve the remission rate of MPO-AAV patients, and HCQ had good safety in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.