ArticleHeliyon2024
Corrosion image classification method based on EfficientNetV2.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing anatomical recognition by surgeons during pelvic lymph node dissection using artificial intelligence.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable Deep Learning Framework for Binary Corrosion Image Classification Using Grad-CAM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Radar-Based Gesture Recognition Using Adaptive Top-K Selection and Multi-Stream CNNs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An enhanced deep learning model for accurate classification of ovarian cancer from histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corrosion is one of the key factors leading to material failure, which can occur in facilities and equipment closely related to people's lives, causing structural damage and thus affecting the safety of people's lives and property. To identify corrosion more effectively across multiple facilities and equipment, this paper utilizes a corrosion binary classification dataset containing various materials to develop a CNN classification model for better detection and distinction of material corrosion, using a methodological paradigm of transfer learning and fine-tuning. The proposed model implementation initially uses data augmentation to enhance the dataset and employs different sizes of EfficientNetV2 for training, evaluated using Confusion Matrix, ROC curve, and the values of Precision, Recall, and F1-score. To further enhance the testing results, this paper focuses on the impact of using the Global Average Pooling layer versus the Global Max Pooling layer, as well as the number of fine-tuning layers. The results show that the Global Average Pooling layer performs better, and EfficientNetV2B0 with a fine-tuning rate of 20 %, and EfficientNetV2S with a fine-tuning rate of 15 %, achieve the highest testing accuracy of 0.9176, an ROC-AUC value of 0.97, and Precision, Recall, and F1-Score values exceeding 0.9. These findings can be served as a reference for other corrosion classification models which uses EfficientNetV2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.