ArticleHeliyon2024
Digital robot-assisted minimally invasive impacted tooth extraction: A case report.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expert consensus on the management of third molar health.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- Dynamic navigation-assisted extraction of impacted maxillary anterior teeth: a model-based accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Trueness analysis of a robot-assisted system for maxillary supernumerary anterior tooth removal: an in vitro study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Dynamic and Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery-A Possible Workflow for the Future?Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- Accuracy comparison between active robot and freehand techniques in modified mid-segment-first extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: an in vitro study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Precision excision of mandibular anterior compound odontoma using autonomous robotic guidance: a clinical case report.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the clinical effects and applicability of minimally invasive impacted teeth extraction using digital robots. Methods: A marker was bonded to the non-surgical area before surgery. A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained and uploaded to the robot software to determine the drilling position of the ring drill. During the surgery, the robot arm automatically navigated to a predetermined position, and the ring drill removed part of the bone tissue and exposed and extracted the impacted teeth. Finally, the surgeon tightly sutured the wounds to the surgical area. Results: Three minimally invasive extractions of impacted teeth with robotic assistance were performed without complications. The surgical area showed good healing during the one-month follow-up examination. Conclusions: Digital robot-assisted minimally invasive extraction of impacted teeth is a highly feasible clinical procedure as it minimises trauma to the surgical area and protects the surrounding blood vessels and nerve bundles, making it a safe and valuable technique with significant potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.