ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of a pathomics model for predicting mRNAsi in lung adenocarcinoma and exploration of biological mechanism.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards understanding cancer dormancy over strategic hitching up mechanisms to technologies.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence-based stemness index in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to predict the level of stemness index (mRNAsi) and survival prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) using pathomics model. Methods: From The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, 327 LUAD patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 229) and a validation set (n = 98) for pathomics model development and evaluation. PyRadiomics was used to extract pathomics features, followed by feature selection using the mRMR-RFE algorithm. In the training set, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) was utilized to establish a model for predicting mRNAsi in LUAD. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Prognostic analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression. Additionally, gene enrichment analysis, tumor microenvironment analysis, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) analysis were performed to explore the biological mechanisms underlying the pathomics prediction model. Results: Multivariable cox analysis (HR = 1.488, 95 % CI 1.012-2.187, P = 0.043) identified mRNAsi as a prognostic risk factor for LUAD. A total of 465 pathomics features were extracted from TCGA-LUAD histopathological images, and ultimately, the most representative 8 features were selected to construct the predictive model. ROC curves demonstrated the significant predictive value of the model for mRNAsi in both the training set (AUC = 0.769) and the validation set (AUC = 0.757). Calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good consistency between the model's prediction of mRNAsi levels and the actual values. DCA indicated a good net benefit of the model. The prediction of mRNAsi levels by the pathomics model is represented using the pathomics score (PS). PS was strongly associated with the prognosis of LUAD (HR = 1.496, 95 % CI 1.008-2.222, P = 0.046). Signaling pathways related to DNA replication and damage repair were significantly enriched in the high PS group. Prediction of immune therapy response indicated significantly reduced Dysfunction in the high PS group (P < 0.001). The high PS group exhibited higher TMB values (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The predictive model constructed based on pathomics features can forecast the mRNAsi and survival risk of LUAD. This model holds promise to aid clinical practitioners in identifying high-risk patients and devising more optimized treatment plans for patients by jointly employing therapeutic strategies targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.