ArticleHeliyon2024
Screening of serum markers in patients with resistant hypertension.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum amyloid A in HFpEF and cardiometabolic diseases.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study delves into the intricacies of resistant hypertension (RH), a prevalent yet enigmatic chronic cardiovascular ailment that is linked to a myriad of complications. Although its full pathogenesis is still shrouded in mystery, the field of proteomics offers a beacon of hope, with its potential to shed light on the proteins that orchestrate the tapestry of life. Harnessing the power of proteomics is essential for demystifying the pathogenesis of RH, enabling more precise diagnostics and treatments, and ultimately improving prognostic outcomes. Methods: Our approach was to employ rigorous statistical analyses to home in on proteins with significant expression variances between our two cohorts. We complemented this with bioinformatics tools to unravel the intricate functions and pathways of these proteins. By synthesizing these insights with the clinical profiles of our patients, we were able to distill a set of definitive biomarkers with diagnostic potential. In our quest for clarity, we also embarked on a retrospective journey, amassing and scrutinizing clinical data from both RH and hypertension (HTN) patients. We crafted and rigorously assessed risk factor models to evaluate their diagnostic prowess. Results: Our exploration spanned across 30 blood samples from RH patients and 20 from those grappling with HTN. Our inquiry yielded some compelling revelations: (1) RH patients showcased 29 unique proteins, in contrast to the 59 unique proteins found in HTN patients. A deeper dive into the proteomic data unveiled molecular functions predominantly tied to lipid metabolism, protein networking, and oxidative stress, with a spotlight on pathways such as cholesterol metabolism, coagulation, and the complement cascade. (2) By charting receiver operating characteristic curves and rigorously analyzing the proteomic data, we surfaced 11 proteins with notable diagnostic potential, tightly interwoven with clinical metrics. Conclusion: Our research has pinpointed 11 proteins that stand as promising serum biomarkers, endowed with significant diagnostic value. This discovery marks a stride towards a more nuanced understanding and management of resistant hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.