ArticleHeliyon2024
The influence of form on motion signal processing in the ventral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The visual system relies on both motion and form signals to perceive the direction of self-motion, yet the coordination mechanisms between these two elements in this process remain elusive. In the current study, we employed heading perception as a model to delve into the interaction characteristics between form and motion signals. We recorded the responses of neurons in the ventral intraparietal area (VIP), an area with strong heading selectivity, to motion-only, form-only, and combined stimuli of simulated self-motion. Intriguingly, VIP neurons responded to form-only cues defined by Glass patterns, although they exhibited no tuning selectivity. In combined condition, introducing a small offset between form and motion cues significantly enhanced neuronal sensitivity to motion cues. However, with a larger offset, the enhancement effect on sensitivity became comparatively smaller. Moreover, we observed that the influence of form cues on neuronal response to motion cues is more pronounced in the later stage (1-2 s) of stimulation, with a relatively smaller effect in the early stage (0-1 s). This suggests a dynamic interaction between motion and form cues over time for heading perception. In summary, our study uncovered that in area VIP, form information plays a role in constructing accurate self-motion perception. This adds valuable insights into the complex dynamics of how the brain integrates motion and form cues for the perception of one's own movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.