ArticleHeliyon2024
A machine learning approach to predicting dry eye-related signs, symptoms and diagnoses from meibography images.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between lid margin collarettes and dry eye disease severity in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Trial
- A Comprehensive Review Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches for Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Morphological Characteristics of the Meibomian Glands: Impact of Demographics and Contact Lens Wear.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence models utilize lifestyle factors to predict dry eye related outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Enhancing Meibography Image Analysis Through Artificial Intelligence-Driven Quantification and Standardization for Dry Eye Research.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To use artificial intelligence to identify relationships between morphological characteristics of the Meibomian glands (MGs), subject factors, clinical outcomes, and subjective symptoms of dry eye. Methods: A total of 562 infrared meibography images were collected from 363 subjects (170 contact lens wearers, 193 non-wearers). Subjects were 67.2 % female and were 54.8 % Caucasian. Subjects were 18 years of age or older. A deep learning model was trained to take meibography as input, segment the individual MG in the images, and learn their detailed morphological features. Morphological characteristics were then combined with clinical and symptom data in prediction models of MG function, tear film stability, ocular surface health, and subjective discomfort and dryness. The models were analyzed to identify the most heavily weighted features used by the algorithm for predictions. Results: MG morphological characteristics were heavily weighted predictors for eyelid notching and vascularization, MG expressate quality and quantity, tear film stability, corneal staining, and comfort and dryness ratings, with accuracies ranging from 65 % to 99 %. Number of visible MG, along with other clinical parameters, were able to predict MG dysfunction, aqueous deficiency and blepharitis with accuracies ranging from 74 % to 85 %. Conclusions: Machine learning-derived MG morphological characteristics were found to be important in predicting multiple signs, symptoms, and diagnoses related to MG dysfunction and dry eye. This deep learning method illustrates the rich clinical information that detailed morphological analysis of the MGs can provide, and shows promise in advancing our understanding of the role of MG morphology in ocular surface health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.