ArticleRadiology case reports2024
Infected calyceal diverticulum in pregnancy: A rare case.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A calyceal diverticulum is a transitional epithelium-lined outpouching of a renal calyx which communicates with the main collecting system through a narrow infundibulum. There are two types of calyceal diverticula: type I, the most common, communicates with the minor calyx, and type II communicates with the major calyx or renal pelvis. Calyceal diverticula are rare and mostly found incidentally; however, they can cause urinary tract infection symptoms (e.g., hematuria, pain, and fever). Diagnosing an infected calyceal diverticulum during pregnancy is particularly challenging due to overlapping symptoms and the limitations of imaging modalities that avoid ionizing radiation. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are necessary to avoid irreversible renal dysfunction and/or urological surgery. Currently, there are no established treatment guidelines for diagnosing and managing infected calyceal diverticula in pregnant patients. The rarity of this condition and the complexities introduced by pregnancy create challenges in standardizing care and determining the optimal treatment strategy, timing of interventions, and the impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. A 29-year-old primigravid woman presented emergently to the hospital at 15 weeks and 4 days gestation with concerns of severe right-sided flank pain and hematuria. Initial renal ultrasound revealed a complex, hypovascular lesion in the interpolar region of the right kidney measuring 6.9 × 6.8 × 3.7 cm, suspicious for mass versus pyelonephritis with associated phlegmon. Further characterization of the lesion by MRI revealed communication between the lesion and the mid-pole collecting system. Differential diagnoses included infected calyceal diverticulum, hydronephrosis of a duplicated system, renal abscess, and infected urinoma. Through a multidisciplinary approach, including ultrasound-guided placement of a drainage catheter at 16 weeks gestation, and tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy, the patient delivered a 3379 g male at 40 weeks and 0 days gestation. This case highlights the potential for conservative management in the absence of clear guidelines and underscores the importance of collaboration among obstetrics, urology, infectious disease, and interventional radiology teams. The implications of this case extend to increasing awareness of calyceal diverticula as a differential diagnosis in pregnant patients presenting with atypical urinary symptoms. It emphasizes the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to ensure both maternal and fetal safety and offers valuable insights that could inform future cases, contributing to the development of more concrete guidelines for managing infected calyceal diverticula during pregnancy. Consent was obtained from the patient and IRB approval was not required for this case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.