Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285956›Full record

ArticleBJR open2024

Establishing the size and configuration of the imaging support workforce: a census of national workforce data in England.

Julie Nightingale, Sarah Etty, Beverley Snaith, Trudy Sevens, Rob Appleyard, Shona Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie NightingaleCentre for Applied Health and Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-0242
Sarah EttyCentre for Applied Health and Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, United Kingdom.
Beverley SnaithFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-0889
Trudy SevensCentre for Applied Health and Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, United Kingdom.
Rob AppleyardCentre for Applied Health and Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, United Kingdom.
Shona KellyCentre for Applied Health and Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The imaging support workforce is a key enabler in unlocking imaging capacity and capability, yet no evidence exists of the workforce size and configuration. This research provides the first comprehensive analysis of workforce data to explore the deployment of the support workforce within National Health Service (NHS) imaging services in England. Methods: Using a census methodology, an anonymized electronic staff record (ESR) data set extracted in December 2022 was analysed to identify support workers and their employment bandings at NHS Trust, regional and national (England) level. Support workforce proportions, median values, and Spearman's rank correlations were calculated. Results: Analysis of 137 NHS Trusts, comprising 100% of acute trusts ( Conclusions: Comprising almost one-quarter of the imaging establishment, models of deployment at bands 2 and 3 are highly variable. Assistant practitioners (band 4) are under-utilised, providing an opportunity to introduce innovations to address workforce demands. Advances in knowledge: This census is the first to provide evidence of the size and structure of the support workforce, the first step in enabling effective workforce transformation. Further research is required to explain the two opposing deployment models.

Indexed as

assistant practitionerimagingradiographyradiologysupport workerworkforce

Identifiers

PMID39285956
PMCPMC11405087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.