ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2024
Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mineral biosignature identification from Raman spectroscopy using machine learning.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- A survey on LLM-as-a-judge.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional geological body numerical model-control information model mapping: a broken-chain correction method.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep-learning-based sub-meter urban construction-site mapping reveals China's dual-track urban renewal.National science review · 2026Article
- Combined machine learning - 3D physics based approach for building damage evaluation: the case of L'Aquila 2009.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Visualising backward information propagation in deep reinforcement learning from a variational data assimilation perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence for sedimentary facies segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The role of artificial intelligence for early warning systems: Status, applicability, guardrails, and ways forward.iScience · 2025Article
- An intelligent YOLO and CNN-BiGRU framework for road infrastructure based anomaly assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated strategies for enhancing agrifood productivity, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving soil health.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Integration: Advances, Applications, and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A revolutionary multi-dimensional data format for remote sensing.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Embodied cognitive intelligence guided Moon sample collection.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Article
- Foundation models and intelligent decision-making: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Scalable earthquake magnitude prediction using spatio-temporal data and model versioning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unleashing the potential of remote sensing foundation models via bridging data and computility islands.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Recent advances in medical gas sensing with artificial intelligence-enabled technology.Medical gas research · 2025Review
- Tracking the carbon footprint of global generative artificial intelligence.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Pan-spatial Earth information system: A new methodology for cognizing the earth system.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the evolution of geoscientific inquiry, tracing the progression from traditional physics-based models to modern data-driven approaches facilitated by significant advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and data collection techniques. Traditional models, which are grounded in physical and numerical frameworks, provide robust explanations by explicitly reconstructing underlying physical processes. However, their limitations in comprehensively capturing Earth's complexities and uncertainties pose challenges in optimization and real-world applicability. In contrast, contemporary data-driven models, particularly those utilizing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), leverage extensive geoscience data to glean insights without requiring exhaustive theoretical knowledge. ML techniques have shown promise in addressing Earth science-related questions. Nevertheless, challenges such as data scarcity, computational demands, data privacy concerns, and the "black-box" nature of AI models hinder their seamless integration into geoscience. The integration of physics-based and data-driven methodologies into hybrid models presents an alternative paradigm. These models, which incorporate domain knowledge to guide AI methodologies, demonstrate enhanced efficiency and performance with reduced training data requirements. This review provides a comprehensive overview of geoscientific research paradigms, emphasizing untapped opportunities at the intersection of advanced AI techniques and geoscience. It examines major methodologies, showcases advances in large-scale models, and discusses the challenges and prospects that will shape the future landscape of AI in geoscience. The paper outlines a dynamic field ripe with possibilities, poised to unlock new understandings of Earth's complexities and further advance geoscience exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.