Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285902›Full record

ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2024

Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.

Tianjie Zhao, Sheng Wang, Chaojun Ouyang, Min Chen, Chenying Liu, Jin Zhang, Long Yu, Fei Wang, Yong Xie, Jun Li and 41 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A survey on LLM-as-a-judge.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

51 authors.

Tianjie ZhaoAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Sheng WangSchool of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Chaojun OuyangState Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China.
Min ChenKey Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Ministry of Education of PRC), Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Chenying LiuData Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Jin ZhangThe National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Long YuSchool of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Fei WangInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yong XieSchool of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Jun LiSchool of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Fang WangState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Sabine GrunwaldSoil, Water and Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, PO Box 110290, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Bryan M WongMaterials Science Engineering Program Cooperating Faculty Member in the Department of Chemistry and Department of Physics Astronomy, University of California, California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Fan ZhangInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zhen QianKey Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Ministry of Education of PRC), Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Yongjun XuInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Chengqing YuInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Wei HanSchool of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Tao SunInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zezhi ShaoInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Tangwen QianInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zhao ChenInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jiangyuan ZengAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Huai ZhangKey Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Husi LetuAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Bing ZhangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Li WangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Lei LuoInternational Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Beijing 100094, China.
Chong ShiAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Hongjun SuCollege of Geography and Remote Sensing, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.
Hongsheng ZhangDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, SAR, China.
Shuai YinAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Ni HuangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Wei ZhaoAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Nan LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Nanjing 210044, China.
Chaolei ZhengAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Yang ZhouCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Changping HuangAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Defeng FengUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Qingsong XuData Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Yan WuKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China.
Danfeng HongAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Zhenyu WangDepartment of Catchment Hydrology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle (Saale) 06108, Germany.
Yinyi LinDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, SAR, China.
Tangtang ZhangKey Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid Regions, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Prashant KumarGlobal Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), School of Sustainability, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Antonio PlazaHyperspectral Computing Laboratory, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.
Jocelyn ChanussotUniversity Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Jiabao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Jiancheng ShiNational Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Lizhe WangSchool of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the evolution of geoscientific inquiry, tracing the progression from traditional physics-based models to modern data-driven approaches facilitated by significant advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and data collection techniques. Traditional models, which are grounded in physical and numerical frameworks, provide robust explanations by explicitly reconstructing underlying physical processes. However, their limitations in comprehensively capturing Earth's complexities and uncertainties pose challenges in optimization and real-world applicability. In contrast, contemporary data-driven models, particularly those utilizing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), leverage extensive geoscience data to glean insights without requiring exhaustive theoretical knowledge. ML techniques have shown promise in addressing Earth science-related questions. Nevertheless, challenges such as data scarcity, computational demands, data privacy concerns, and the "black-box" nature of AI models hinder their seamless integration into geoscience. The integration of physics-based and data-driven methodologies into hybrid models presents an alternative paradigm. These models, which incorporate domain knowledge to guide AI methodologies, demonstrate enhanced efficiency and performance with reduced training data requirements. This review provides a comprehensive overview of geoscientific research paradigms, emphasizing untapped opportunities at the intersection of advanced AI techniques and geoscience. It examines major methodologies, showcases advances in large-scale models, and discusses the challenges and prospects that will shape the future landscape of AI in geoscience. The paper outlines a dynamic field ripe with possibilities, poised to unlock new understandings of Earth's complexities and further advance geoscience exploration.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninggeosciencemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39285902
PMCPMC11404188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.