THIRTY YEARS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: LAW STUDENTS AND LAWYERS AS PLAINTIFFS AND ADVOCATES.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. On the Importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act at 30.Journal of disability policy studies · 2023
   Article
2. Diversity and inclusion in the legal profession: disclosure of cancer and other health conditions by lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ + .Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
   Article
3. Workplace health surveillance and COVID-19: algorithmic health discrimination and cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
   Article
4. Disability-inclusive employment, cancer survivorship, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.