Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285787›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Partial weight-bearing and range of motion limitation significantly reduce the loads at medial meniscus posterior root repair sutures in a cadaveric biomechanical model.

Matthias Sukopp, Nina Schwab, Jonas Schwer, Julian Frey, Jonas Walter Metzger, Anita Ignatius, Mario Perl, Firooz Salami, Daniel Vogele, Thomas Kappe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthias SukoppInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-2541
Nina SchwabInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jonas SchwerInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Julian FreyInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jonas Walter MetzgerInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anita IgnatiusInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Mario PerlDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Firooz SalamiMovement Analysis Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel VogeleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas KappeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Andreas Martin SeitzInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-8552

Funding

German Research Foundation SE3135/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the influence of medial meniscus posterior root avulsion (MMPRA) before and after surgical treatment on the biomechanics of the knee joint, including suture repair forces during daily and crutch-assisted gait movements.

methodsMMPRA were investigated in eight human cadaver knee joint specimens by a dynamic knee joint simulator with daily (normal gait, gait with additional rotational movement, standing up, sitting down) and rehabilitation-associated movements (crutch-assisted gait with limited flexion range of motion [30°] and 30% [toe-touch weight-bearing, TTWB] and 50% of body weight [partial weight-bearing, PWB]) with simulated physiologic muscle forces. Each specimen was tested in intact, torn and repaired (transtibial suture) state. The biomechanical parameters were: medial mean contact pressure and area, knee joint kinematics, medial displacement of the posterior meniscus horn and loading on the anchoring suture.

resultsSignificant reduction of the contact area due to the avulsion was observed in all movements except for PWB and sitting down. MMPRA repair significantly increased the contact areas during all movements, bringing them to levels statistically indistinguishable from the initial state. MMPRA resulted in a medial displacement up to 12.8 mm (sitting down) and could be reattached with a residual displacement ranging from 0.7 mm (PWB) to 5.7 mm (standing up), all significantly (p < 0.001) reduced compared to the torn state. The mean peak anchoring suture load increased from TTWB (77 N), PWB (91 N) to normal gait (194 N), gait rotation (207 N), sitting (201 N; p < 0.01) and to standing up (232 N; p = 0.03).

conclusionSurgical treatment of MMPRA allows restoration of physiological knee joint biomechanics. Crutch-assisted movements reduce the loading of the repair suture, thus likewise the risk for failure. From a biomechanical point of view, crutch-assisted movements are recommended for the early rehabilitation phase after MMPRA repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Knee JointMenisci, TibialRange of Motion, ArticularTibial Meniscus InjuriesWeight-BearingAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedPartial Weight-BearingSuture Techniquesdynamic knee joint simulatorknee contact mechanicsmedial meniscus posterior root avulsionrehabilitation protocolsuture repair

Identifiers

PMID39285787
PMCPMC12022837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.