ArticleJBI evidence implementation2026
Gastrostomy management by the nursing team in a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil: a best practice implementation project.
Article in JBI evidence implementation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.
objectiveThis project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.
methodsThis study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.
resultsThe baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.
conclusionThe baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.