ArticleCancer science2024
Prognosis prediction of PDAC via detection of O-glycan altered extracellular vesicles in perioperative sera.
Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers in cancer: a machine learning blueprint for liquid biopsy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Cancers: Advances Through Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Blood-based biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: developments over the last decade and what holds for the future- a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Prognosis prediction of PDAC via detection of O-glycan altered extracellular vesicles in perioperative sera.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Review of Methods and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a fatal malignancy due to the difficulty in diagnosis and poor prognosis because of the high recurrence rate, necessitating reliable biomarkers to improve the diagnosis and prognosis. However, the existing markers have limitations. We previously identified extracellular vesicles (EVs) recognized by O-glycan-binding lectins (Amaranthus caudatus agglutinin [ACA]) as a novel diagnostic biomarker for PDAC using an EV-counting system (ExoCounter). This retrospective study analyzed changes in ACA-positive EVs in perioperative PDAC serum and its association with prognosis using ExoCounter. Absolute EV levels in the pre- and postoperative sera of 44 patients who underwent curative pancreatectomy for PDAC were quantified using ExoCounter. The carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels declined in most samples postoperatively, and presented no correlation with poor prognosis. In contrast, ACA-positive EVs increased in serum at 7 days postoperatively in 27 of 44 patients (61.4%). We therefore divided participants with ACA-positive EVs before and after surgery into elevation and decline groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with higher ACA-positive EVs were significantly shorter than those with lower ACA-positive EVs (26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.018; 11.9 vs. 38.6 months, P = 0.013). Multivariable analysis revealed that ACA-positive EV elevation in postoperative serum was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.891, P = 0.023) and RFS (HR = 2.650, P = 0.024). The detection of ACA-positive EVs in perioperative serum may be used to predict the prognosis of PDAC in the early postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.