Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285504›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

A research agenda to advance the study of implementation mechanisms.

Cara C Lewis, Hannah E Frank, Gracelyn Cruden, Bo Kim, Aubyn C Stahmer, Aaron R Lyon, Bianca Albers, Gregory A Aarons, Rinad S Beidas, Brian S Mittman and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Cara.Lewis@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-8075
Hannah E FrankThe Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Gracelyn CrudenChestnut Health System, Lighthouse Institute - OR Group, 1255 Pearl St, Ste 101, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.
Bo KimCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Aubyn C StahmerUC Davis MIND Institute, 2825 50Th St, Sacramento, CA, 95819, USA.
Aaron R LyonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA.
Bianca AlbersInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla California, San Diego, 92093, CA, USA.
Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60661, USA.
Brian S MittmanDivision of Health Services Research & Implementation Science, Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Nate J WilliamsSchool of Social Work, Boise State University, Boise, ID, 83725, USA.
Byron J PowellCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
MNoE Group

Funding

Project 3P50MH126219 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DORSEY, SHANNON · 2021 to 2024
$5.9M
Research ProgramP50CA244690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
Optimizing Implementation in Cancer Control: OPTICC - Research Program CoreP50CA244432 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2019 to 2023
$4.6M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
1/2 Effectiveness of a Multi-Level Implementation Strategy for ASD Interventions - SupplementR01MH111950 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, LAUREN · 2017 to 2020
$3.3M
2/2 Effectiveness of a Multi-Level Implementation Strategy for ASD InterventionsR01MH111981 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI STAHMER, AUBYN C. · 2017 to 2020
$3.3M
MECHANISMS: The MECHANics of Implementation Strategies and MeasureSR01CA262325 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2021 to 2023
$2.2M
Refining and Pilot Testing a Decision Support Intervention to Facilitate Adoption of Evidence-Based Programs to Improve Parent and Child Mental HealthK01MH128761 · NIMH · OSLC DEVELOPMENTS · PI Gracelyn Cruden · 2022 to 2026
$843k
IMPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF EBPS IN MENTAL HEALTH: DEVELOPING AND PILOTING THE COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH TO SELECTING AND TAILORING IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (COAST-ISK01MH113806 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, BYRON JAMES · 2017 to 2020
$697k
Advancing Mechanisms of Implementation to Accelerate Sustainable Evidence-Based Practice IntegrationR13HS025632 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2018 to 2020
$147k
AHRQ HHS R13 HS025632AHRQ HHS R13HS025632National Institute for Mental Health K01MH113806NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244432NCI NIH HHS P50CA244432NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244690NCI NIH HHS P50CA244690NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262325NCI NIH HHS R01CA262325NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH113806NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH128761NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH126219NIMH NIH HHS P50MH126219NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111950NIMH NIH HHS R01MH111950NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111981NIMH NIH HHS R01MH111981NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS R25MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation science scholars have made significant progress identifying factors that enable or obstruct the implementation of evidence-based interventions, and testing strategies that may modify those factors. However, little research sheds light on how or why strategies work, in what contexts, and for whom. Studying implementation mechanisms-the processes responsible for change-is crucial for advancing the field of implementation science and enhancing its value in facilitating equitable policy and practice change. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded a conference series to achieve two aims: (1) develop a research agenda on implementation mechanisms, and (2) actively disseminate the research agenda to research, policy, and practice audiences. This article presents the resulting research agenda, including priorities and actions to encourage its execution.

methodBuilding on prior concept mapping work, in a semi-structured, 3-day, in-person working meeting, 23 US-based researchers used a modified nominal group process to generate priorities and actions for addressing challenges to studying implementation mechanisms. During each of the three 120-min sessions, small groups responded to the prompt: "What actions need to be taken to move this research forward?" The groups brainstormed actions, which were then shared with the full group and discussed with the support of facilitators trained in structured group processes. Facilitators grouped critical and novel ideas into themes. Attendees voted on six themes they prioritized to discuss in a fourth, 120-min session, during which small groups operationalized prioritized actions. Subsequently, all ideas were collated, combined, and revised for clarity by a subset of the authorship team.

resultsFrom this multistep process, 150 actions emerged across 10 priority areas, which together constitute the research agenda. Actions included discrete activities, projects, or products, and ways to shift how research is conducted to strengthen the study of implementation mechanisms.

conclusionsThis research agenda elevates actions to guide the selection, design, and evaluation of implementation mechanisms. By delineating recommended actions to address the challenges of studying implementation mechanisms, this research agenda facilitates expanding the field of implementation science, beyond studying what works to how and why strategies work, in what contexts, for whom, and with which interventions.

Indexed as

CausalityDesignDeterminantsImplementation scienceImplementation strategiesMeasurementMechanismsMediatorsMethodsTheory

Identifiers

PMID39285504
PMCPMC11403843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.