Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285423›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Health professionals' perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana.

Nathan Kumasenu Mensah, Godwin Adzakpah, Jonathan Kissi, Kasim Abdulai, Hannah Taylor-Abdulai, Stephen Benyi Johnson, Christabell Opoku, Cephas Hallo, Richard Okyere Boadu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ClinNoteAgents: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Predicting and Interpreting Heart Failure 30-Day Readmission from Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nathan Kumasenu Mensah *Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Godwin Adzakpah *Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. godwin.adzakpah@ucc.edu.gh.
Jonathan KissiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Kasim AbdulaiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Hannah Taylor-AbdulaiSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Physician Assistant Studies, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Stephen Benyi JohnsonDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Christabell OpokuDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Cephas HalloDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Richard Okyere BoaduDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic Health Record systems (EHRs) offer significant benefits and have transformed healthcare in developed countries. However, their implementation and adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains low due to challenges and competing interests. Health professionals' perception of EHRs can influence their adoption and continued use. The objectives of this study are to explore the perception of health professionals regarding implemented EHR systems in three hospitals in Ghana and identify factors influencing their perception and satisfaction.

methodsIn this study, we employed a concurrent mixed method design to collect data from study participants from May to June 2023. The quantitative part employed a descriptive-survey and the qualitative (in-depth interview) techniques was applied. After obtaining written informed consent from each respondent, a structured survey questionnaire was filled out by the health professionals from three hospitals. An a priori power calculation was used to determine the sample size for the quantitative component. Two hundred and sixty-three (263) health professionals completed the questionnaire from the three facilities. A purposive sampling technique was used to select fifteen [1] participants for the interviews. A semi-structured interview guide was used for the in-depth interviews. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded into themes using QSR Nvivo 12 software before thematic content analysis.

resultsOur findings revealed that 213 (80.99%) health professionals perceived the EHRs as beneficial to patients and were generally satisfied. An overwhelming majority, 197 (74.90%) of the health professionals, were satisfied with its use and expressed interest in continuing to use the system. The majority of health professionals viewed the EHRs to have improved their work and workflow processes and provided the desired results. However, few other health professionals were dissatisfied with the system because they viewed the EHRs as frustrating due to unstable internet connectivity and power supply. Other concerns were related to the privacy and confidentiality of patient information. They believe access to patient information should be on a need-to-know basis, and patient information should not be accessible to all other clinicians except those involved directly in their care processes.

conclusionThe study revealed that health professionals have a positive perception of the implemented EHRs, are highly satisfied with them, and are interested in continuing to use them. However, health professionals' concerns about the unstable power supply, poor internet connectivity, security, and confidentiality of patient's information need attention, to mitigate their frustrations and boost their confidence in the system.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsAdultAttitude to ComputersFemaleGhanaHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnaireseHealth implementationElectronic health recordsGhanaHealth professionalsPerceptionSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39285423
PMCPMC11403855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.