ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Enhancing clinical data retrieval with Smart Watchers: a NiFi-based ETL pipeline for Elasticsearch queries.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From electronic health records to real-world evidence: Savana Next-Generation Registry digital solution.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim is to develop and deploy an automated clinical alert system to enhance patient care and streamline healthcare operations. Structured and unstructured data from multiple sources are used to generate near real-time alerts for specific clinical scenarios, with an additional goal to improve clinical decision-making through accuracy and reliability.
methodsThe automated clinical alert system, named Smart Watchers, was developed using Apache NiFi and Python scripts to create flexible data processing pipelines and customisable clinical alerts. A comparative analysis between Smart Watchers and the legacy Elastic Watchers was conducted to evaluate performance metrics such as accuracy, reliability, and scalability. The evaluation involved measuring the time taken for manual data extraction through the electronic patient record (EPR) front-end and comparing it with the automated data extraction process using Smart Watchers.
resultsDeployment of Smart Watchers showcased a consistent time savings between 90% to 98.67% compared to manual data extraction through the EPR front-end. The results demonstrate the efficiency of Smart Watchers in automating data extraction and alert generation, significantly reducing the time required for these tasks when compared to manual methods in a scalable manner.
conclusionsThe research underscores the utility of employing an automated clinical alert system, and its portability facilitated its use across multiple clinical settings. The successful implementation and positive impact of the system lay a foundation for future technological innovations in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.