ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Ultrasomics differentiation of malignant and benign focal liver lesions based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound features and LI-RADS categorization: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of a Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo establish a nomogram for differentiating malignant and benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) using ultrasomics features derived from contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
methods527 patients were retrospectively enrolled. On the training cohort, ultrasomics features were extracted from CEUS and b-mode ultrasound (BUS). Automatic feature selection and model development were performed using the Ultrasomics-Platform software, outputting the corresponding ultrasomics scores. A nomogram based on the ultrasomics scores from artery phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP) and delayed phase (DP) of CEUS, and clinical factors were established. On the validation cohort, the diagnostic performance of the nomogram was assessed and compared with seniorexpert and resident radiologists.
resultsIn the training cohort, the AP, PVP and DP scores exhibited better differential performance than BUS score, with area under the curve (AUC) of 84.1-85.1% compared with the BUS (74.6%, P < 0.05). In the validation cohort, the AUC of combined nomogram and expert was significantly higher than that of the resident (91.4% vs. 89.5% vs. 79.3%, P < 0.05). The combined nomogram had a comparable sensitivity with the expert and resident (95.2% vs. 98.4% vs. 97.6%), while the expert had a higher specificity than the nomogram and the resident (80.6% vs. 72.2% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.205).
conclusionsA CEUS ultrasomics based nomogram had an expert level performance in FLL characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.