ArticleBMC genomics2024
Deep neural network models for cell type prediction based on single-cell Hi-C data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the 3D genome at single-cell resolution: techniques, computation, and mechanistic landscapes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Unveiling Multi-Scale Architectural Features in Single-Cell Hi-C Data Using scCAFE.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell type prediction is crucial to cell type identification of genomics, cancer diagnosis and drug development, and it can solve the time-consuming and difficult problem of cell classification in biological experiments. Therefore, a computational method is urgently needed to classify and predict cell types using single-cell Hi-C data. In previous studies, there is a lack of convenient and accurate method to predict cell types based on single-cell Hi-C data. Deep neural networks can form complex representations of single-cell Hi-C data and make it possible to handle the multidimensional and sparse biological datasets.
resultsWe compare the performance of SCANN with existing methods and analyze the model by using five different evaluation metrics. When using only ML1 and ML3 datasets, the ARI and NMI values of SCANN increase by 14% and 11% over those of scHiCluster respectively. However, when using all six libraries of data, the ARI and NMI values of SCANN increase by 63% and 88% over those of scHiCluster respectively. These findings show that SCANN is highly accurate in predicting the type of independent cell samples using single-cell Hi-C data.
conclusionsSCANN enhances the training speed and requires fewer resources for predicting cell types. In addition, when the number of cells in different cell types was extremely unbalanced, SCANN has higher stability and flexibility in solving cell classification and cell type prediction using the single-cell Hi-C data. This predication method can assist biologists to study the differences in the chromosome structure of cells between different cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.