Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285176›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Neuromorphic intermediate representation: A unified instruction set for interoperable brain-inspired computing.

Jens E Pedersen, Steven Abreu, Matthias Jobst, Gregor Lenz, Vittorio Fra, Felix Christian Bauer, Dylan Richard Muir, Peng Zhou, Bernhard Vogginger, Kade Heckel and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Neuron Based on Electrical Anisotropy from WSeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jens E Pedersen *KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. jeped@kth.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-7415
Steven Abreu *CogniGron Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2272-315X
Matthias JobstTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3147-1625
Gregor LenzNeurobus, Toulouse, France.
Vittorio FraPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9175-2838
Felix Christian BauerSynSense, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1631-7403
Dylan Richard MuirSynSense, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3856-826X
Peng ZhouLuxiTech Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Bernhard VoggingerTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9042-5405
Kade HeckelUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-7021-8834
Gianvito UrgesePolitecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-7593
Sadasivan ShankarStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1555-639X
Terrence C StewartNational Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Sadique SheikSynSense, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jason K EshraghianUniversity of California, Santa Cruz, USA.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 390696704EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 860360EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 945539National Science Foundation (NSF) BCS 1824198National Science Foundation (NSF) ECCS-233216Statens Naturvidenskabelige Forskningsrad (Danish National Science Foundation) P1U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-76SF00515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neural networks and neuromorphic hardware platforms that simulate neuronal dynamics are getting wide attention and are being applied to many relevant problems using Machine Learning. Despite a well-established mathematical foundation for neural dynamics, there exists numerous software and hardware solutions and stacks whose variability makes it difficult to reproduce findings. Here, we establish a common reference frame for computations in digital neuromorphic systems, titled Neuromorphic Intermediate Representation (NIR). NIR defines a set of computational and composable model primitives as hybrid systems combining continuous-time dynamics and discrete events. By abstracting away assumptions around discretization and hardware constraints, NIR faithfully captures the computational model, while bridging differences between the evaluated implementation and the underlying mathematical formalism. NIR supports an unprecedented number of neuromorphic systems, which we demonstrate by reproducing three spiking neural network models of different complexity across 7 neuromorphic simulators and 4 digital hardware platforms. NIR decouples the development of neuromorphic hardware and software, enabling interoperability between platforms and improving accessibility to multiple neuromorphic technologies. We believe that NIR is a key next step in brain-inspired hardware-software co-evolution, enabling research towards the implementation of energy efficient computational principles of nervous systems. NIR is available at neuroir.org.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAction PotentialsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningNeurons

Identifiers

PMID39285176
PMCPMC11405706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.