Persistent resampling of external information despite 25 repetitions of the same visual search templates.

We commonly load visual working memory minimally when to-be-remembered information remains available in the external world. In visual search, this is characterised by participants frequently resampling previously encoded templates, which helps minimize cognitive effort and improves task performance. If all search templates have been rehearsed many times, they should become strongly represented in memory, possibly eliminating the benefit of reinspections. To test whether repetition indeed leads to less resampling, participants searched for sets of 1, 2, and 4 continuously available search templates. Critically, each unique set of templates was repeated 25 trials consecutively. Although the number of inspections and inspection durations initially decreased strongly when a template set was repeated, behaviour largely stabilised between the tenth and last repetition: Participants kept resampling templates frequently. In Experiment 2, participants performed the same task, but templates became unavailable after 15 repetitions. Strikingly, accuracy remained high even when templates could not be inspected, suggesting that resampling was not strictly necessary in later repetitions. We further show that seemingly 'excessive' resampling behaviour had no direct within-trial benefit to speed nor accuracy, and did not improve performance on long-term memory tests. Rather, we argue that resampling was partially used to boost metacognitive confidence regarding memory representations. As such, eliminating the benefit of minimizing working memory load does not eliminate the persistence with which we sample information from the external world - although the underlying reason for resampling behaviour may be different.