SynthesisJournal of nephrology2024
Factors affecting intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) and its prognostic value in predicting leak risk and gastrointestinal symptoms in adult peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children on peritoneal dialysis: a review and European practice survey.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraperitoneal pressure measurement offers therapeutic and prognostic benefits in predicting leak risks and gastrointestinal symptoms in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the prognostic utility of intraperitoneal pressure measurements and different estimated intraperitoneal pressure equations in predicting the risk of non-infectious complications in PD patients.
methodsDatabases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched up to July 2023. Randomised and non-randomised trials were included, focusing on End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) patients undergoing PD. Primary outcomes were variables associated with intraperitoneal pressure, while secondary outcomes included PD-related non-infectious complications and gastrointestinal symptoms. Data synthesis combined meta-analysis with narrative synthesis. This review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023475138).
resultsOut of 1828 identified studies, 12 were included for systematic review and 10 for meta-analysis. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) showed a consistent positive correlation with intraperitoneal pressure (BMI: r = 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.61, I DISCUSSION: This review underscores a significant association between intraperitoneal pressure and anthropometric measures (BMI and BSA). The majority of the studies identified included a small sample and considerable bias. However, the association between intraperitoneal pressure and clinically relevant outcomes was not clear.
conclusionsWhile increasing body mass index and body surface areas are associated with increasing intraperitoneal pressure, the clinical relevance of measuring intraperitoneal pressure in an adult population remains unclear, particularly given the absence of an association with clinically relevant non-infectious outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39285125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.