Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285101›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2025

Testing the dual-memory framework: individual differences in the magnitude of the retrieval practice effect and fluid intelligence.

Marcos Felipe Rodrigues de Lima, Luciano Grüdtner Buratto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcos Felipe Rodrigues de LimaDepartment of Basic Psychological Processes, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, ICC Sul, Sala ASS-012/5, Brasília, DF, CEP 70.910-900, Brazil. lima.piraju@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5922-2543
Luciano Grüdtner BurattoDepartment of Basic Psychological Processes, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, ICC Sul, Sala ASS-012/5, Brasília, DF, CEP 70.910-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-7824

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieving information from memory enhances long-term retention. In this manuscript, we describe the dual-memory framework, which makes interval-scale predictions of the magnitude of this retrieval practice effect. After outlining the framework, we use data from our laboratory-both at the group level and at the distribution level-to fit the equations from the dual-memory framework. Overall, we successfully fitted the model predictions to the observed average data. In addition, we compared the predicted and the observed distributions of performance in the retrieval practice condition. More importantly, we introduce a useful approach to simulate empirical scenarios and test the relationship between individual-difference variables and the retrieval practice effect. We illustrate the application of this approach using data from a study that measured fluid intelligence. Future studies may benefit from contrasting different strength-based frameworks.

Indexed as

IndividualityIntelligenceMental RecallPractice, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalYoung AdultIndividual differencesMathematical modelingMemoryRetrieval practiceTesting effect

Identifiers

PMID39285101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.