Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285075›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Latino Enclaves and Healthcare Accessibility: An Ecologic Study Across Five States.

Alice Guan, Salma Shariff-Marco, Kevin A Henry, Katherine Lin, Dan Meltzer, Alison J Canchola, Angel Arizpe, Aniruddha B Rathod, Amy E Hughes, Candyce H Kroenke and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social environment and services at the Special Immunobiological Reference Centers: epidemiological study, Minas Gerais, 2022-2024.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alice GuanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9075-4230
Salma Shariff-MarcoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2541-3333
Kevin A HenryDepartment of Geography, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Katherine LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8948-7630
Dan MeltzerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0109-5190
Alison J CancholaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Angel ArizpeKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4075-2675
Aniruddha B RathodPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-0952
Amy E HughesPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1085-0282
Candyce H KroenkeKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6128-3118
Scarlett L GomezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert A HiattDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Antoinette M StroupCancer Prevention and Control, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Paulo S PinheiroDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8502-835X
Francis BoscoePumphandle LLC, Camden, ME, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-2941
Hong ZhuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8562-3351
Sandi L PruittPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Sandi.Pruitt@UTSouthwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1007-9176

Funding

Social networks and disparities in health behaviors and breast cancer outcomes in immigrant womenR01CA230440 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2019 to 2024
$3.2M
Ethnicity and Nativity in Cancer - Latino & Asian Enclaves: The ENCLAVE StudyR01CA237540 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PRUITT, SANDI LEIGH, SHARIFF-MARCO, SALMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
An Electronic Health Record-Based Tool to Identify Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients at Risk of Low Social SupportR01CA253028 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2020 to 2025
$2.6M
A lifecourse approach to evaluating the effect of structural stigma on cancer risk factors among sexual minoritiesF31CA257351 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUAN, ALICE · 2021 to 2023
$114k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230440NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253028NIH HHS F31CA257351NIH HHS R01CA230440NIH HHS R01CA237540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHispanic or Latino populations (hereafter, "Latinos") are a rapidly expanding U.S. demographic and have documented inequities in preventable diseases and conditions. Many Latinos reside in ethnic enclaves, and understanding the context and healthcare accessibility within these places is critical.

objectiveThis study described the neighborhood social and built environment attributes of Latino enclaves and evaluated associations between enclaves and geographic healthcare accessibility.

designCross-sectional ecologic analysis. SUBJECTS: Our unit of analysis was all neighborhoods (n ~ 20,000 census tracts) in California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas in years 2000 and 2010. MAIN MEASURES: The primary exposure of interest, "Latino enclaves," was defined using neighborhood-level data on the percentage of Latino residents, foreign-born Latinos, Spanish speakers with limited English proficiency, and linguistically isolated Spanish-speaking households. The primary outcome was a neighborhood-level measure of geographic healthcare accessibility of primary care physicians, which accounted for both the supply of physicians and population demand for healthcare (i.e., population size within driving distance).

resultsApproximately 30% of neighborhoods were classified as Latino enclaves, 87% of which were enclaves in both 2000 and 2010. Compared with non-enclaves, Latino enclaves had more markers of structural disadvantage including having higher proportions of poverty, uninsured individuals, crowded housing, and higher crime scores. Results from multivariable models suggest that more culturally distinct neighborhoods (i.e., higher enclave score) had lower healthcare accessibility, though when stratified, this association persisted only in high (≥ 20%) poverty neighborhoods.

conclusionThis study highlights several neighborhood structural disadvantages within Latino enclaves, including higher poverty, uninsured individuals, and crime compared to non-enclave neighborhoods. Moreover, our findings point to the need for interventions aimed at improving healthcare accessibility particularly within socioeconomically disadvantaged Latino enclaves. Addressing these inequities demands multifaceted approaches that consider both social and structural factors to ensure equitable healthcare access for Latino populations.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFloridaHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleNew JerseyNew YorkTexasUnited StatesEthnic enclavesHealthcare accessibilityNeighborhoodsPopulation healthSocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID39285075
PMCPMC11914426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.