Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285068›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and change in tumor load on MRI to assess response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

L M Janssen, B B L Penning de Vries, M H A Janse, E van der Wall, S G Elias, R Salgado, P J van Diest, K G A Gilhuijs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L M JanssenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B B L Penning de VriesJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M H A JanseImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van der WallDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S G EliasJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R SalgadoDepartment of Pathology, ZAS Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
P J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K G A GilhuijsImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. K.G.A.Gilhuijs@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-8649

Funding

Horizon 2020 755333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we aimed to explore if the combination of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and change in tumor load on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging leads to better assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer, compared to either alone.

methodsIn 190 NAC treated patients, MRI scans were performed before and at the end of treatment. The percentage of stromal TILs (%TILs) was assessed in pre-NAC biopsies according to established criteria. Prediction models were developed with linear regression by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and cross validation (CV), with residual cancer burden as the dependent variable. Discrimination for pathological complete response (pCR) was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). We used Cox regression analysis for exploring the association between %TILs and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

resultsFifty-one patients reached pCR. In all patients, the %TILs model and change in MRI tumor load model had an estimated CV AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.78) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.61-0.79), respectively, whereas a model combining the variables resulted in an estimated CV AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.83). In the group with tumors that were ER positive and HER2 negative (ER+/HER2-) and in the group with tumors that were either triple negative or HER2 positive (TN&HER2+) separately, the combined model reached an estimated CV AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.60-0.88) and 0.70(95% CI 0.59-0.82), respectively. A significant association was observed between pre-treatment %TILS and RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.53-0.98), for every standard deviation increase in %TILS, p = 0.038).

conclusionThe combination of TILs and MRI is informative of response to NAC in patients with both ER+/HER2- and TN&HER2+ tumors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisROC CurveTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenBreast cancerMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete responseTumor infiltrating tumor cells

Identifiers

PMID39285068
PMCPMC11785616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.