ArticleCurrent microbiology2024
Impact of a Potent Strain of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB), Bacillus subtilis S1 on Bacterial Community Composition, Enzymatic Activity, and Nitrogen Content in Cucumber Rhizosphere Soils.
Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions of PGPR from the phylum bacillota with native rhizosphere microbiota: current insights and future perspectives.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Enhancing N use Efficiency, Increasing Wheat Yield and Reducing Chemical Fertilizer Dependence via Beneficial Bacteria.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium GXGL-4A Promotes the Growth of Cucumber Plant Under Nitrogen Stress by Altering the Rhizosphere Microbial Structure.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Use ofBiology · 2025Article
- Use of PGPB in bio-fertilisation: preserving the soil microbiome and enhancing field production of alfalfa.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antagonistic bacterial strains from Bacillus spp. have been widely studied and utilized in the biocontrol of phytopathogens and the promotion of plant growth, but their impacts on the rhizosphere microecology when applied to crop plants are unclear. Herein, the effects of applying the antagonistic bacterium Bacillus subtilis S1 as a biofertilizer on the rhizosphere microecology of cucumbers were investigated. In a pot experiment on cucumber seedlings inoculated with S1, 3124 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained from the rhizosphere soils using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, and the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria that accounted for 49.48% in the bacterial community. S1 treatment significantly reduced the abundances of soil bacterial taxa during a period of approximately 30 days but did not affect bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere soils of cucumbers. The enzymatic activities of soil nitrite reductase (S-Nir) and dehydrogenase (S-DHA) were significantly increased after S1 fertilization. However, the activities of soil urease (S-UE), cellulase (S-CL), and sucrase (S-SC) were significantly reduced compared to the control group. Additionally, the ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen contents of S1-treated soil samples were significantly lower than those of the control group. S1 fertilization reshaped the rhizosphere soil bacterial community of cucumber plants. The S-CL activity and nitrate-nitrogen content in rhizosphere soil affected by S1 inoculation play important roles in altering the abundance of rhizosphere soil microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39285060What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.