ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Predictive model for contralateral inguinal hernia repair within three years of primary repair: a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality of life outcomes of minimally invasive repair of occult contralateral inguinal hernias: an ACHQC analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited reports have discussed the risk factors for contralateral inguinal hernia (CIH) repair. We generated a risk factor scoring system to predict CIH within 3 years after unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
methodsWe extracted the admission data of patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair without any other operation from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were randomly divided into 80% and 20% validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was used to generate the scoring system, which was used in the validation group.
resultsOverall, 170,492 adult men were included, with a median follow-up of 87 months. The scoring system ranged from 0-5 points, composited with age (< 45 years, 0 points; 45-65 years, 2 points; 65-80 years, 3 points; > 80 years, 2 points) and two comorbidities (cirrhosis and prostate disease: 1 point each). The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.606 and 0.551 for the derivation and validation groups, respectively. The rates and adjusted odds ratios (OR) of CIH repair in the derivation group were 3.0% at 0-2 points, 5.5% (1.854, p < 0.001) at 3, 6.7% (2.279, p < 0.001) at 4, and 6.9% (2.348, p < 0.001) at 5, with similar results in the validation group [2.3% at 0-2 points, 3.8% (1.668, p < 0.001) at 3, 5.4% (2.386, p < 0.001) at 4, and 6.8% (3.033, p < 0.001) at 5].
conclusionsThe CIH scoring system effectively predicted CIH repair within three years of primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Surgeons could perform laparoscopic surgery with CIH scores > 2 points which enables easier contralateral exploration and repair during the same surgery, without additional incisions, to minimize the need for future surgeries. However, further prospective validation of this scoring system is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39285043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.