Observational studySurgical endoscopy2024
Patient and hospital factors influence surgical approach in treatment of acute cholecystitis.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The robotic era: 11-year retrospective study of cholecystectomies at a veterans affairs hospital.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomies have become standard due to patient and hospital advantages; however, this approach is not always achievable. Acute and gangrenous cholecystitis increase the likelihood of conversion from MIS to open cholecystectomy. This study aims to examine patient and hospital factors underlying differential utilization of MIS vs open cholecystectomies indicated for acute cholecystitis.
methodsThis is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent a cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 identified from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze patient, geographic, and hospital variables as well as surgical approach.
resultsOur total cohort included 53,503 patients of which 98.4% (n = 52,673) underwent an initial minimally invasive approach and with a conversion rate of 3.3% (n = 1,759). On multivariable analysis advancing age increased the likelihood of either primary open (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.17; ≥ 65 aOR 3.00) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.20; ≥ 65 aOR 3.15). Similarly, male sex had higher odds of either primary open (aOR 1.70) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (aOR 1.84). Hospital characteristics increasing the likelihood of either primary open or conversion to open cholecystectomy included teaching hospitals (aOR 1.37 and 1.28, respectively) and safety-net hospitals (aOR 1.46 and 1.33, respectively).
conclusionsWith respect to cholecystectomy, it is well-established that a minimally invasive surgical approach is associated with superior patient outcomes. Our study focused on the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and identified increasing age as well as male sex as significant factors associated with open surgery. Teaching and safety-net hospital status were also associated with differential utilization of open, conversion-to-open, and MIS. These findings suggest the potential to create and apply strategies to further minimize open surgery in the setting of acute cholecystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39285035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.