Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39285028›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Contrast media viscosity and its potential effect on the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Zoé Jottrand, Thierry Metens, Marie Cassart, Freddy Avni, Aurélie D'Hondt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for Diagnosis of Ectopic Ureters in Five Female Dogs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoé JottrandDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), Boulevard du Triomphe 201, 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry MetensDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme (HUB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie CassartDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Etterbeek-Ixelles (IRIS SUD), Rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Freddy AvniDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), Boulevard du Triomphe 201, 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
Aurélie D'HondtDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), Boulevard du Triomphe 201, 1160, Brussels, Belgium. aurelie.dhondt@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-7678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo confirm that contrast-enhanced voiding cystourosonography (ceVUS) diagnoses more vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) than voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and assess whether this could be explained by contrast agent viscosity differences. MATERIALS AND

methodsChildren addressed for a VCUG for suspected or known VUR between April 2021 and June 2023 were prospectively included. CeVUS and VCUG were consecutively performed during the same procedure by two operators; for each pelviureteric unit (PUU), VUR presence was assessed and scored (I-V scale). At least 6 months later, three radiologists reassessed VUR grading on all ceVUS static images. The viscosity of the two contrast agents and of the urine were measured at 25 °C and 37 °C. Wilcoxon tests were used for comparisons and linear Cohen's Kappa coefficient for Interobserver and Intraobserver agreement.

resultsEighty-nine children, representing 192 PUU, were included. VUR was detected in 54 PUUs by at least one technique, by both in 30/54, by ceVUS only in 21/54 (38.8%), and by VCUG only in 3/54 (5.5%). VUR grade was higher with ceVUS in 19/30 (63.3%, p < 0.0008) PUUs. The ceVUS agent viscosity at 25 °C/37 °C (1.13 cP/1.03 cP) was almost identical to urine viscosity (1.14 cP/1.02 cP) and it was respectively 8 and 6 times lower than VCUG contrast agent viscosity (9.44 cP/6.03 cP). The Cohen's kappa for ceVUS grading was between 0.75-0.97 (interobserver) and 0.93-0.98 (intraobserver).

conclusionOur study confirms that ceVUS detects more VUR and grades them higher in comparison to VCUG in children. This could be explained by the lower viscosity of the US contrast agent. KEY POINTS: Question Why are there differences in detecting and grading VUR between ceVUS and VCUG? Finding VUR was detected by ceVUS or VCUG only in, respectively 38.8% and 5.5% of PUUs. VUR grade was higher with ceVUS in 63.3%. Clinical relevance The higher detection rate and grading of vesicoureteral reflux in children by ceVUS might be explained by the lower viscosity of its sonographic contrast agent. CeVUS might reproduce the urine movement in the urinary tract.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaVesico-Ureteral RefluxChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesUltrasonographyUrographyViscosityContrast MediaContrast-enhanced voiding urosonographyPediatric imagingVesicoureteral refluxViscosityVoiding cystourethrography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.