ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Real world challenges and barriers for positive airway therapy use in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUntreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, diagnosing and treating OSA in AIS is challenging. We aimed to determine the feasibility of portable monitoring (PM) for diagnosis and positive airway pressure therapy for treatment of OSA in an inpatient stroke population.
methodsWe recruited inpatients with AIS from Cleveland Clinic. Those who consented underwent PM; participants with a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 10 were offered auto-titrating positive airway pressure therapy (APAP). Ease-of-use questionnaires were completed. We summarized categorical variables using n(%) and continuous variables using mean ± SD or median [IQR].
results27 participants (age 59.8 ± 11.8, 51.9% female, 51.9% Black, BMI 33.4 ± 8.5) enrolled. The study ended early due to Medicare contracting that forced most patients to complete stroke rehabilitation outside the Cleveland Clinic health system. 59.3% had large vessel occlusions and 53.8% had moderate/severe disability (Modified Rankin score ≥ 2). PM was attempted in 21 participants, successful in 18. Nurses and patients rated the PM device as highly easy to use. 13 of 18 (72%) patients who had an REI ≥ 10 consented to APAP titration, but only eight (61.5%) of those 13 used APAP for more than one night, and only five (27.8%) used APAP up to 90 days with data captured for only one participant. Five required troubleshooting at titration, and only one had adherent APAP usage by objective assessment after discharge.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the real-world challenges of assessing and treating OSA in an AIS population, highlighting the necessity for further research into timely and feasible screening and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.