ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Out-of-Distribution Detection and Radiological Data Monitoring Using Statistical Process Control.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time quality control in optoacoustic mesoscopy for enhancing data quality and standardization in clinical studies.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Keeping Medical AI Healthy and Trustworthy: A Review of Detection and Correction Methods for System Degradation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Review
- Detection of Confounders and Potential Confounders in Computed Tomography Lung Datasets.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- An Unsupervised Brain Extraction Quality Control Approach for Efficient Neuro-Oncology Studies.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Robust Detection of Out-of-Distribution Shifts in Chest X-ray Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Federated artificial intelligence monitoring service (FAMOS): an in silico feasibility study.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- General OOD detection via model-aware and subspace-aware variable priority.Knowledge and information systems · 2026Article
- Self-adaptive forward-forward network for anomaly detection and medical image analysis.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Pediatric Healthcare: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models often fail with data that deviates from their training distribution. This is a significant concern for ML-enabled devices as data drift may lead to unexpected performance. This work introduces a new framework for out of distribution (OOD) detection and data drift monitoring that combines ML and geometric methods with statistical process control (SPC). We investigated different design choices, including methods for extracting feature representations and drift quantification for OOD detection in individual images and as an approach for input data monitoring. We evaluated the framework for both identifying OOD images and demonstrating the ability to detect shifts in data streams over time. We demonstrated a proof-of-concept via the following tasks: 1) differentiating axial vs. non-axial CT images, 2) differentiating CXR vs. other radiographic imaging modalities, and 3) differentiating adult CXR vs. pediatric CXR. For the identification of individual OOD images, our framework achieved high sensitivity in detecting OOD inputs: 0.980 in CT, 0.984 in CXR, and 0.854 in pediatric CXR. Our framework is also adept at monitoring data streams and identifying the time a drift occurred. In our simulations tracking drift over time, it effectively detected a shift from CXR to non-CXR instantly, a transition from axial to non-axial CT within few days, and a drift from adult to pediatric CXRs within a day-all while maintaining a low false positive rate. Through additional experiments, we demonstrate the framework is modality-agnostic and independent from the underlying model structure, making it highly customizable for specific applications and broadly applicable across different imaging modalities and deployed ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.