ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Risk factors and chlorhexidine dressings in external ventricular drainage: a retrospective analysis on infection rates.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis of factors affecting the postoperative drainage in patients with abdominoplasty with circumferential liposuction.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study endeavors to scrutinize risk factors associated with infections resulting from external ventricular drainage (EVD) and to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressing in mitigating infection rates. Conducted from January 2018 to July 2023, this single-center study encompassed 108 EVD patients. Comprehensive data on demographics, comorbidities, surgical procedures, and the utilization of chlorhexidine dressing were meticulously compiled. The primary endpoint was the incidence of EVD-associated infections based on CDC criteria. Infection rates attributable to EVD were 24.32% without and 20.59% with chlorhexidine dressing. Notably, diabetes mellitus emerged as the solitary significant infection risk factor (p < 0.01). Although the application of chlorhexidine dressing suggested a propensity for diminishing infection rates, statistical significance remained elusive. No notable disparities were discerned in variables such as catheter type, procedural location, and underlying diseases. Diabetes mellitus has been identified as a significant risk factor for EVD-associated infections. While the utilization of chlorhexidine dressing exhibited a potential reduction in infection rates, the lack of statistical significance underscores the imperative for further research, encompassing more expansive randomized trials, to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of chlorhexidine dressings in preventing EVD-associated infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39284977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.