ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence Following Extensive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is There a Role for Urodynamic Investigation in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTo assess the outcomes of mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) and identify risk factors for persistent USI (P-USI).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 84 women who underwent a staged approach to MUS for USI after PRS for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification III and IV). The primary outcome was objective cure rate, defined by negative urine leakage on urodynamic study and a 1-h pad test weight of < 2 g. Subjective cure rate was through a negative response to question 3 of UDI-6.
resultsThe overall objective cure rate was 81.0%. The highest cure rate was observed in de novo USI (MUS-D; 89.7%) compared with women with persistent USD (MUS-P). Patients with overt SUI exhibited lower cure rates than those with occult SUI. Predictive factors for persistent USI were lower pre-operative maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP; p = 0.031) and higher BMI in the MUS-P group than in the MUS-D group (p = 0.008). Subjective improvement was noted, especially in the MUS-D group, with a subjective cure rate of 78.6%. Those with MUS-D reported a higher impact on patient well-being post-surgery. No complications were observed after MUS surgery at follow-up.
conclusionsOvert USI, low MUCP and high BMI are independent predictors of persistent USI after a staged MUS approach after pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39284970What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.